Please wait while loading...

aironline

You can see your flagged judgments in My bookmark in User data.


Search Database Menu
  • Supreme Court Of India
    (From : AIROnline 2022 JHA 1004)

    Hon'ble Judge(s) Hon'ble Judge(s): B. V. Nagarathna, Satish Chandra Sharma , JJ

    Dharmendra Kumar Singh v. Hon'ble High Court Of Jharkhand

    D.O.D : 15/01/2025

    Appeal Allowed

    Constitution of India , Art.309— Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service Recruitment Appointment and Conditions of Service Rules (2001) , R.4, R.5— Promotion and seniority - Claim for - Post of District Judge - Appellants who had successfully qualified suitability test, could not have been deprived of their legitimate right of promotion to the post of District Judge, only on account of lower placement in merit list - Appellants who were promoted during pendency of litigation, would be entitled for notional promotion from the same date on which other officers from the select list, were appointed.

    AIROnline 2022 JHA 1004-ReversedAIR 2024 SC 3256-Followed(Paras56)

    ...Read Judgment

  • Supreme Court Of India

    Hon'ble Judge(s) Hon'ble Judge(s): J. B. Pardiwala, R. Mahadevan , JJ

    Rajeeb Kalita v. Union Of India

    D.O.D : 15/01/2025

    Order Accordingly

    Constitution of India , Art.32, Art.21— Right to life - Toilet facilities in Courts - It is settled law that the right to life encompasses within it the right to healthy and hygienic life and the right to live with dignity -It is duty of every State/UT under Part IV of the Constitution to ensure a healthy environment and to continuously strive for improving public health - Litigants for fear of sitting in courts for long hours without access to basic amenities should not be forced to refrain from exercising their legal rights - Absence of adequate washroom facilities undermines equality and poses a barrier to the fair administration of justice - Directions were issued accordingly

    Public interest litigation was initiated with a prayer for directions to ensure that basic toilet facilities are made available in all Courts/ Tribunals in the Country for men, women and handicapped persons including transgenders.

    Held, it is duty of every State/UT under Part IV of the Constitution to ensure a healthy environment and to continuously strive for improving public health . Absence of adequate washroom facilities undermines equality and poses a barrier to the fair administration of justice.

    It is settled law that the right to life encompasses within it the right to healthy and hygienic life and the right to live with dignity. Creation of adequate public toilets also protects the privacy and removes the threat to ladies and transgender persons. Availability of access to public toilet is an important duty of the States/UTs under the Directive Principles and it is just not enough if such provisions are made but steps are to be taken to ensure that the toilets are maintained throughout the year. Without such access to the three genders, the States/UTs can no longer claim to be welfare State.

    Following directions were issued, in the larger public interest:

    (i) The High Courts and the State Governments / UTs shall ensure the construction and availability of separate toilet facilities for males, females, PwD, and transgender persons in all Court premises and Tribunals across the Country.

    (ii) The High Courts shall oversee and ensure that these facilities are clearly identifiable and accessible to Judges, advocates, litigants, and court staff.

    (iii) For the aforesaid purpose, a committee shall be constituted in each of the High Courts under the chairmanship of a Judge nominated by the Chief Justice and members comprising the Registrar General/Registrar of the High Court, the Chief Secretary, the PWD Secretary and the Finance Secretary of the State, a representative of the Bar Association and any other officers as they deem it fit, within a period of six weeks.

    (iv) The committee shall formulate a comprehensive plan, carry out the following tasks, and ensure its implementation.

    (a) have a statistic of number of persons visiting the courts every day on an average and ensure that sufficient separate washrooms are built and maintained.

    (b) conduct a survey regarding the availability of toilet facilities, lacunae in the infrastructure and maintenance of the same. demarcate existing washrooms and assess the need to convert existing washrooms to meet the requirement of above categories

    (c) provide alternate facilities like mobile toilets, during construction of new ones, environment friendly toilets (bio-toilets) across the courts as done in Railways.

    (d) Qua women, transgender persons, PwD, provide clear signage and indications along with functional amenities, such as, water, electricity, operational flushes, provision of hand soap, napkins, toilet paper and up to date plumbing systems. Specifically, for PwD washrooms, ensure the installation of ramps and that washrooms are designed to accommodate them.

    (e) conduct a study about maintaining architectural integrity in respect of Heritage Court buildings such as Mumbai, Calcutta, Chennai, etc. To work with the existing facilities by using underutilised spaces to build washrooms, modular solutions to work around the old plumbing systems, engaging professionals to assess the solutions to modernise sanitation facilities.

    (f) effectuate a mandatory cleaning schedule and ensure staffing for maintenance and upkeeping dry bathroom floors along with sensitising users on clean washroom practices.

    (g) ensure regular maintenance of the toilets by outsourcing professional agencies on contract basis, by employing modern cleaning methods and machinery to ensure better hygiene and usability.

    (h) put in place a mechanism that mandates the periodic inspection of the functionality of these washrooms and specific compliance reports to be filed to a person in-charge.

    (i) frame a complaint / redressal system for speedy reporting of defective washrooms and instant repair of the same.

    (j) ensure that there are working and stocked sanitary pad dispensers in women, PwD, and transgender washrooms.

    (k) nominate or appoint a person specifically in each premises of the High Court/District Court/ Civil Court/Tribunal as nodal officer to monitor the maintenance, address the complaints and communicate with the presiding officer or the appropriate committee; such authority should address the complaints and give standing instructions in writing regarding maintenance and working of the said toilets; and the responsibilities should be fixed.

    (l) have a transparent and separate monetary fund for the construction and maintenance of toilets in court complexes.

    (m) have child safe washrooms in Family court complexes with trained staff equipped to provide children with a safe and hygienic space.

    (n) Provide separate rooms (interconnected with the women's washroom) to cater to nursing mothers' or mothers with infants with feeding stations and changing napkins available. To consider incorporating breastfeeding facilities to support nursing mothers, along with dedicated platforms for changing napkins within toilet areas, similar to the amenities available in airports. (o) High Courts to develop and sustain the quality of maintenance can create a grading system for the District Courts and other courts/forums under its supervision, provide certifications and motivate the appropriate officials and staff, which can form part of their service records.

    (iv) The State Governments / UTs shall allocate sufficient funds for construction, maintenance and cleanliness of the toilet facilities within the court premises, which shall be periodically reviewed in consultation with the committee constituted by the High Courts.

    (v) A status report shall be filed by all the High Courts and the States/UTs within a period of four months.

    ...Read Judgment

  • Hon'ble Judge(s) Hon'ble Judge(s): S. Sounthar , J

    Poonam Kumar Khaire Manohar v. Union of India

    D.O.D : 10/01/2025

    Order Accordingly

    Passports Act (15 of 1967) , S.5— Constitution of India , Art.21A— Renewal of passport - Application for renewal of minor child's passport by father, a single parent - Mother's consent withheld due to her return to United States - Passport Manual requires consent from both parents, but petitioner was unable to obtain consent due to strained relationship - Child was pursuing education in U.S. and passport due to expire - Right to education recognized as a fundamental right under Art. 21-A, should not be impeded by parents strained relationship - Authorities were directed to process application for renewal and issue passport without mother's consent.

    ...Read Judgment

  • Hon'ble Judge(s) Hon'ble Judge(s): P. B. Balaji , J

    N.Sundarapandian v. M/s.Tower Vision India Private Limited, Chennai

    D.O.D : 10/01/2025

    Petition Allowed

    Arbitration and Conciliation Act (26 of 1996) , S.11, S.21— Appointment of arbitrator - Application for - Licence Deed was executed between parties - According to petitioners, respondents had breached terms and conditions of License Deed and hence disputes were required to be referred before Arbitrator in terms of license deed - Licence Deed provided arbitration clause - Petitioners had rightly invoked S. 21 and issued notice to respondents - Petitioners were therefore entitled to appointment of sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between parties - Sole arbitrator was appointed.

    ...Read Judgment

  • Hon'ble Judge(s) Hon'ble Judge(s): K. Kumaresh Babu , J

    M/s.Bavadharani Builders, v. Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai

    D.O.D : 10/01/2025

    Petition Dismissed

    Constitution of India , Art.226— Tender - Earnest money deposit - Claim for exemption from payment of earnest money deposits to MSME as envisaged under G.O.Ms.No.199, Finance (Salaries) Department - Tender for construction of shopping complex, classroom and toilet building - State pleaded that the said G.O. was applicable only to MSMEs involved in manufacturing items, and not to building contractors - Petitioner was engaged in construction of building and other allied works connected thereto - Said G.O. cannot be made applicable to present tender and petitioner was not entitled for the benefit of said G.O.

    ...Read Judgment

Page  of
 Next
 Prev

Registered Office

All India Reporter Pvt. Ltd.
Meadows House,
Nagindas Master Road, Fort
Mumbai - 400 023

Copyright © 2025 All India Reporter Pvt. Ltd. | All rights reserved

Copyright © 2025 All India Reporter Pvt. Ltd.
All rights reserved