License & Printed By : | https://www.aironline.in |
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 1891 ::2005 AIR SCW 1509
Supreme Court Of India
(From : AIR 2002 Calcutta 144)
Hon'ble Judge(s): R. C. Lahoti, G. P. Mathur , JJ

Civil P.C. (5 of 1908) , O.7 R.11— Transfer of Property Act (4 of 1882) , S.111— Eviction suit - Cause of action - Suit filed prior to expiry of fixed term of lease - Maintainability - Plaintiff found entitled to relief prayed for by time written statement came to be filed - Objection as to maintainability of suit, not pressed by defendant at preliminary stage - Dismissal of suit on ground of its being premature, when it came to be decided after lapse of over eight years - Not justified. AIR 2002 Cal 144, Reversed.Rangayya Naidu v. Basana, AIR 1926 Mad 594, held per incuriam. No amount of waiver or consent can confer jurisdiction on a Court which it inherently lacks or where none exists. The filing of a suit when there is cause of action though premature does not raise a jurisdictional question. The claim may be well merited and the Court does have jurisdiction to hear the suit and grant the relief prayed for but for the fact that the plaintiff should have waited a little more before entering the portals of the Court. In such a case the question is one of discretion. In spite of the suit being premature on the date of its institution the Court may still grant relief to the plaintiff if no manifest injustice or prejudice is caused to the party proceeded against. Where the right to sue has not matured on the date of the institution of the suit a....

Buy and Download By Entering Following Details (Worth /-)

Step 1
Enter your contact details.
Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid 10 digit mobile number
Please enter your valid email id.
I agree on Terms & Conditions
Step 2
Enter your payment details

 J