License & Printed By : | https://www.aironline.in |
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 1492 ::2011 AIR SCW 1886
Supreme Court Of India
(From : Karnataka)*
Hon'ble Judge(s): P. Sathasivam, B. S. Chauhan , JJ

(A) Evidence Act (1 of 1872) , S.65— Secondary evidence - Photocopy of document - Admissibility - Executor merely admitted his signatures on photocopy of power of attorney but denied its content thereof - Court without considering probative value of contents of document, decreed suit for specific performance - Improper. R. F. A. No. 265 of 1999 D/- 3-2-2004 (Kant), Reversed. In a case where original documents are not produced at any time, nor, any factual foundation has been led for giving secondary evidence, it is not permissible for the Court to allow a party to adduce secondary evidence. Thus, secondary evidence relating to the contents of a document is inadmissible, until the non-production of the original is accounted for, so as to bring @page-SC1493 it within one or other of the cases provided for in S. 65. The secondary evidence must be authenticated by foundational evidence that the alleged copy is in fact a true copy of the original. Mere admission of a document in evidence does not amount to its proof. Therefore, the documentary evidence is required to be proved in accordance with law. The Court has an obligation to decide the question of admissibility of a document in secondary evidence before making endorsement thereon. Where the respondent had merely admitted his signature on the photocopy of the powe....

Buy and Download By Entering Following Details (Worth /-)

Step 1
Enter your contact details.
Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid 10 digit mobile number
Please enter your valid email id.
I agree on Terms & Conditions
Step 2
Enter your payment details

 J